Sunday, October 2, 2022
HomePersonal FinanceCRA hits taxpayer with penalty for TFSA over-contribution

CRA hits taxpayer with penalty for TFSA over-contribution


Jamie Golombek: The Canada Income Company appears more and more unwilling to forgive TFSA over-contributions

Article content material

Regardless of greater than a decade of collective expertise with tax-free financial savings accounts (TFSAs), Canadians are nonetheless unintentionally over-contributing to their accounts, and getting assessed an over-contribution penalty tax, which the Canada Income Company appears more and more unwilling to forgive.

Commercial 2

Article content material

Take the most recent case of a British Columbia taxpayer who relied on data on the My Account part of the CRA’s web site to find out her TFSA contribution restrict. She misinterpreted the positioning’s data, and was hit with a penalty tax, which the CRA refused to waive, so she took the matter to court docket. Earlier than delving into the main points of her case, let’s evaluate the TFSA contribution guidelines, the penalty for over-contributing and the accessible treatments. 

You possibly can contribute $6,000 to your TFSA for 2022. Relying in your age, your restrict might be as excessive as $81,500 in the event you’ve by no means made a TFSA contribution earlier than, since unused room routinely carries ahead from one calendar 12 months to the following. You too can recontribute any TFSA withdrawals again into your TFSA, starting the calendar 12 months following the 12 months of withdrawal. 

Commercial 3

Article content material

In case you unintentionally contribute to your TFSA past your most, you will get hit with an over-contribution penalty tax that is the same as one per cent monthly for every month you’re over your restrict. In case you get assessed this tax, you possibly can ask the CRA to waive or cancel it, which it has the ability to do if it may be established the tax arose “as a consequence of an affordable error” and the over-contribution is withdrawn from the TFSA “at once.” If the CRA refuses to cancel the tax, you possibly can take the matter to federal court docket, the place a decide will decide whether or not the CRA’s resolution to not waive the tax was cheap. 

On this most up-to-date TFSA over-contribution case, the taxpayer initially opened her first TFSA in 2009, contributing as soon as that 12 months, twice in 2011, twice in 2014, twice in 2015, and as soon as in 2016. In Might 2016, she obtained an “training letter” from the CRA exhibiting a contribution room restrict on December 31, 2015, of destructive $19,500. The letter said that the “destructive quantity means you contributed an excessive amount of.” She was informed to withdraw the quantity instantly to keep away from the one-per-cent month-to-month tax, which she did, and no penalty tax was assessed. 

Commercial 4

Article content material

Quick ahead to 2019, and the taxpayer’s TFSA contribution room restrict stood at $7,849, however she made TFSA contributions that 12 months totalling $26,002. This once more caught the eye of the CRA who in July 2020 despatched her a letter advising that she had over-contributed to her TFSA by $18,153, assessing her with penalty tax of $1,784. 

Upon receiving the CRA’s letter, the taxpayer took speedy motion and eliminated the surplus TFSA contribution. She then wrote to the CRA to request it waive the tax. In her letter, she stated she “utterly misunderstood the correct quantity I ought to contribute.” She made two contributions, one in January 2019 and one other in February 2019, primarily based on the quantity proven in January 2019 on her “My Account” web page on the CRA’s web site.  

Commercial 5

Article content material

The issue, nevertheless, is that the CRA My Account TFSA data just isn’t up to date in actual time. Monetary establishments are required to electronically submit a TFSA file to the CRA by the final day of February, which reveals all contributions and withdrawals for the prior 12 months. This information might not be up to date on-line till April, so a taxpayer logging into My Account in January 2022, for instance, could solely see their TFSA transactions from 2020 and prior years, till the 2021 information is uploaded to the system.  

On this case, the taxpayer additional defined that when she went to the web site, the data displayed confirmed she had sufficient room to make the contributions to her TFSA, so she made two contributions in January and February 2019. She argued that she made a “cheap error” as a result of her over-contributions have been primarily based on the data displayed on My Account, the supply of which was the CRA. She defined that when she made these contributions, she didn’t know that the “Contribution Room” quantities as displayed on My Account might be up to date to account for added data obtained by CRA. 

Commercial 6

Article content material

The taxpayer, who misplaced her job in August 2020 in the course of the pandemic, was financially supporting her son who was a full-time college scholar, who had additionally misplaced his job because of the pandemic. As well as, her mom, who has a incapacity, lived along with her and was absolutely depending on her financially. She stated the over-contribution tax “was unfair and positioned undue hardship on her. The quantity of curiosity earned on the surplus contribution was lower than $400 …whereas the tax assessed on the TFSA over-contribution exceeded $1,700.”  

Commercial 7

Article content material

Regardless of this, the CRA denied her request for aid, writing: “Though your TFSA extra contributions have been unintentional, we don’t take into account misinterpreting your TFSA contribution restrict to be an affordable error. Underneath Canada’s self-assessment taxation system, people are answerable for understanding their TFSA accounts and their limits.” 

The taxpayer then took the matter to court docket. At federal court docket, the decide just isn’t permitted to vary the CRA’s resolution even when they disagree with it. The court docket solely wants to find out whether or not the CRA’s resolution was “cheap,” which focuses on whether or not the choice was “intelligible, clear and justified.” 

The problem got here down as to whether the taxpayer’s misunderstanding constituted a “cheap error.” The decide, in reviewing the CRA’s resolution, said that “it was moderately open to CRA to conclude that the (taxpayer) didn’t make a ‘cheap error’ … As is well-known, the Canadian tax system is a self-reporting system. It depends on taxpayers to adjust to the (Revenue Tax Act) … For TFSA functions, the taxpayer is accountable to pay attention to their contribution limits and to make sure that their contributions adjust to relevant guidelines.” 

The decide, though sympathetic in the direction of the taxpayer, nonetheless concluded that the CRA’s resolution to not waive the penalty tax was cheap, successfully upholding penalty tax.  

Jamie Golombek, CPA, CA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com 

_____________________________________________________________

 In case you like this story, join the FP Investor Publication.

_____________________________________________________________

Commercial

Feedback

Postmedia is dedicated to sustaining a vigorous however civil discussion board for dialogue and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Feedback could take as much as an hour for moderation earlier than showing on the positioning. We ask you to maintain your feedback related and respectful. We have now enabled e mail notifications—you’ll now obtain an e mail in the event you obtain a reply to your remark, there may be an replace to a remark thread you observe or if a person you observe feedback. Go to our Neighborhood Tips for extra data and particulars on find out how to alter your e mail settings.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments